Multi-model document review

One model is an opinion.Three is evidence.

Claude, GPT and Gemini read the same document, blind to each other. Every finding shows how many of the 3 agreed. Agreement lets you move faster; disagreement tells you where to slow down.

Web workspace and Microsoft Word add-in. Early access.

Vendor MSA v4Round 1 · complete14 findings9 confirmed · 3 disagree · 2 flagged
Confirmed3 of 3
Indemnity cap excludes third-party IP claims
Highstrong
3 of 3
Auto-renewal notice window is 90 days
Lowstrong
3 of 3
Models disagree1 or 2 of 3
Liability carve-out may not survive termination
Blockermoderate
2 of 3
Governing law clause conflicts with the venue clause
Mediumweak
1 of 3
Flagged for reviewAny count
Data processing addendum referenced but not attached
Highweak
3 of 3
Why three

One model gives you one confident answer. Three give you a count.

Ask one model to review a contract and you get one confident answer. It sounds just as sure when it is wrong as when it is right. So you either trust all of it or check all of it yourself, and neither is review.

Ask three independently and you learn what one answer cannot tell you: how many found the same thing. That count is what lets you spend your attention where it matters. Crossfire is built around it.

How it works

A review session in three moves.

  1. 01

    Upload and set the objective

    One subject document, any supporting context, and a one-sentence brief. PDF, DOCX, TXT, MD or RTF.

  2. 02

    Run a round

    Claude, GPT and Gemini review independently and in parallel. A moderator merges overlapping findings, working from the analyses labeled A, B and C in place of provider names.

  3. 03

    Move on what agrees. Decide what does not.

    Findings arrive in three tiers: Confirmed, Models disagree, Flagged for review. Reject or add context. Anything untouched rides into the next round.

See the full walkthrough

Reading the count

Every finding tells you how much to trust it.

123 OF 3OF 3OF 3 How many of the 3analyses found it
PauseOne analysis raised it and two did not. Read it before you believe it.
ThinkTwo agree, one took a different position. Open it and decide for yourself.
MoveAll three found it. The strongest signal a round can give you. Skim it and keep moving.
Confirmed3 of 3

All 3 analyses found it. Skim it and keep moving.

Models disagree1 or 2 of 3

Slow down here: open it, read what each analysis said, and decide for yourself.

What you do with a finding

Do nothingDefault

The finding carries into the next round unchanged. Not acting is deferring, not accepting.

Reject finding1 click

It is wrong or does not matter. It drops out of every later round. Undo in 1 click.

Add contextA note or a file

The models missed something. Give them a sentence or a document, and the next round sees it. It stays on the record as audit context.

Flagged for review

Agreement is not proof.

Three models can agree and still be wrong. They learn from much of the same material, so they can share a blind spot. They can also agree on a finding that rests on thin evidence in your document.

Crossfire treats agreement as a reason to move faster, not a reason to stop looking. A finding that is high severity gets a person's eyes even at 3 of 3. So does a finding with weak signal, where the models agreed but the evidence is thin.

That is the Flagged for review tier. It is small by design and it is never hidden. The count tells you how far to trust a finding. It never makes the call for you.

Built for people who are accountable for the answer
Blind to brand

The moderator works from Analysis A, B and C in place of provider names.

Cost on every round

The workspace and the add-in show what each round cost before you run the next one.

Your document stays yours

Nothing is edited without you. Exports are an HTML summary, a findings list, or a rewritten copy of your Word file. The original stays as you uploaded it.

Analysis, not advice

Crossfire organizes what three models found. The call is still yours.

Microsoft Word

Findings land where you already work, as Word comments

Add the Crossfire tab to Word. Run a round on the open document and read each finding as a native comment anchored to the exact text. Depth control: Quick, Standard, Deep.

See the Word add-in

Beyond documents

Ask a question. Get three answers and one synthesis.

For decisions without a document, start a Chat session. Three models propose, one moderates and writes a synthesis, and the three raw answers stay visible beside it. Choose Reviewed to add a critic pass that flags contested claims before the synthesis is written.

Review the next document with three models instead of one.

Crossfire is in early access. Tell us what you review and we will set you up.